Kejriwal Supreme Court Bail 2024 brought significant relief to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal as the Supreme Court granted him bail on Friday in the ongoing excise policy case. This crucial development comes just as the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) prepares for the upcoming Haryana Assembly Elections. With Kejriwal now free to campaign, the ruling has major implications for both his political career and the party’s electoral strategy.
Supreme Court Grants Bail with Conditions
The Kejriwal Supreme Court Bail 2024 decision was delivered by a bench comprising Justice Suryakant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan. While granting Kejriwal bail, the court imposed several conditions. Among these, the Delhi Chief Minister is required to post a bond of ₹10 lakh and secure two sureties. Moreover, Kejriwal has been restricted from making any public comments regarding the excise policy case and must cooperate fully with the ongoing trial.
This case, which involved the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED), has been a major political battlefront in recent months. The conditions of his bail ensure that Kejriwal will not influence the investigation or trial.
Key Conditions of Bail
- No Public Comments on the Case: One of the most stringent conditions set by the Supreme Court is that Kejriwal is barred from making any public statements about the excise policy case. This includes refraining from media interviews or public remarks on the investigation.
- Restricted Entry into the Chief Minister’s Office: Kejriwal is also prohibited from entering the Chief Minister’s office or signing any official documents. This effectively curtails his administrative powers until further notice from the court. Justice Bhuyan initially expressed concerns over this condition but later agreed to its imposition.
- Non-communication with Witnesses: Another major restriction is Kejriwal’s inability to communicate with any witnesses involved in the case. This is to ensure that there is no undue influence on the trial process. If required, Kejriwal must appear in court and continue cooperating fully.
Legal Opinions on Kejriwal’s Bail
In the Kejriwal Supreme Court Bail 2024 decision, the two Supreme Court justices presented slightly different perspectives on the legality of Kejriwal’s arrest and the basis for his bail.
Justice Suryakant’s View
Justice Suryakant emphasized that Kejriwal’s arrest did not violate Section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). According to Suryakant, the CBI followed due process, and the arrest was legal. He stated, “We have considered personal liberty and the fact that the trial is unlikely to conclude soon.” Justice Suryakant went on to note that keeping Kejriwal in custody under these circumstances would be unjust, especially since he had already been granted bail in the more stringent Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case.
Justice Bhuyan’s Perspective
In contrast, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan raised concerns about the timing of the CBI’s actions. According to Bhuyan, the fact that the CBI did not arrest Kejriwal for over 22 months but suddenly took action after he was granted bail in the ED case raises serious questions. Justice Bhuyan noted that such arrests on vague grounds must be scrutinized, stating, “The accused cannot be forced to make statements, and vague responses do not justify the arrest or continued custody.”
He further remarked that the CBI should work towards changing its image of being a “caged parrot” and ensure that its investigations are perceived as fair and impartial.
Impact on Kejriwal’s Political Future
The Kejriwal Supreme Court Bail 2024 ruling comes at a critical juncture for AAP, which is gearing up for the Haryana Assembly Elections. The bail allows Kejriwal to hit the campaign trail at a crucial time, giving the party a significant morale boost. With the legal challenges now temporarily behind him, Kejriwal’s return to the political arena could reinvigorate AAP’s election strategy.
However, the conditions of the bail restrict Kejriwal’s ability to directly comment on the excise policy case, limiting his scope to address the charges publicly. Despite this, AAP leaders have expressed relief over the Supreme Court’s decision, viewing it as an opportunity to refocus on the elections and governance.
The Excise Policy Case: A Political Hotbed
The excise policy case has been a central issue in Delhi’s political landscape. The CBI’s investigation into alleged irregularities in the formulation and implementation of the city’s liquor policy has cast a long shadow over Kejriwal’s administration. The opposition, particularly the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has used this case to target AAP ahead of state elections.
With the Kejriwal Supreme Court Bail 2024 ruling, AAP now has a chance to rebuild its narrative, focusing on its development agenda rather than being mired in legal controversies.
Conclusion
The Kejriwal Supreme Court Bail 2024 ruling marks a significant victory for the Delhi Chief Minister as he prepares for a key electoral battle. Although the bail comes with strict conditions, it provides Kejriwal the breathing room he needs to continue his political activities. As the excise policy case unfolds, the spotlight remains on both Kejriwal’s leadership and the legal battles surrounding his administration.
Stay connected to know more on arcnews.online for global news like Kejriwal Supreme Court Bail 2024. For videos updates visit our YouTube. Do subscribe to Arcnews to get latest updates directly in your mail box.
Have A Great Day.